AI chatbots are incredibly useful for my work. I use them for research, for proofreading and fact-checking, and for keeping track of articles and pitches. There’s one job I had really hoped AI could take off my hands. Sadly, both Claude and ChatGPT failed dismally.
I have no problem with AI handling the mundane tasks
AI should help make us more efficient
Credit: 1X
There’s an excellent quote from author Joanna Maciejewska that completely sums up my feelings about AI. “I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.”
The same is true of my work. I don’t want AI to write articles for me, and I don’t want to read articles written by AI. They don’t have real-world experience with what they’re writing about.
There are plenty of parts of my work that AI does help with, and it’s the mundane parts, such as fact-checking, that I’m more than happy for AI to make easier. The less time I have to spend on routine tasks, the more time I can spend writing.
There’s one particularly mundane task that I still do manually, and it takes up a lot of time. I was hoping that AI might be able to take it off my hands.
Annotating screenshots is a thankless task
Adding arrows to multiple images eats up time
One of the most tedious parts of writing how-to guides is creating step-by-step screenshots. These are really useful for helping readers to follow the guides quickly and accurately, but they’re a pain to create.
First, I have to work through all of the steps and take screenshots of all the relevant parts. This isn’t too painful, as it only takes a second or two to take a screenshot.
The time-consuming parts come when I have to annotate the screenshots. When a screenshot is trying to illustrate a specific menu or button, it’s not always immediately obvious which menu or button the screenshot is focused on. To solve this, arrows are added to the screenshots to indicate the appropriate objects.
Adding these annotations isn’t hard; it’s just time-consuming and tedious, especially when I have a lot of screenshots to annotate. My hope was that I’d be able to point an AI chatbot at a folder of screenshots, upload the text of the step-by-step instructions, provide some examples of previously annotated screenshots, and have the AI add the arrows to the images for me. It felt like this was something that should be possible with the current state of AI tools.
Related
OpenAI is close to turning ChatGPT into a super app—here’s what it will do
You could create and code in one place.
ChatGPT wasn’t up to the job
The results were poor
ChatGPT currently has one of the best image generation models out there. The GPT Image 2 model can produce impressive results that can be very hard to distinguish from real images. I figured that if any chatbot could nail adding arrows to screenshots, it would be ChatGPT.
I uploaded the screenshots and step-by-step instructions and gave ChatGPT an example image so it knew what the annotations should look like. ChatGPT got to work and annotated all the screenshots for me.
The results were terrible. The arrows were pointing to completely the wrong things or to nothing at all. Some of the arrows were mangled, and not a single screenshot was even close to being usable. I tried again with refined prompts that were more explicit to try to solve these issues, but every time I tried, I got the same poor results.
Even with computer use, Claude failed
Full control of my computer wasn’t enough
Having failed with ChatGPT, I decided to give Claude a go. While Claude didn’t have native image generation tools, I’d used a Claude feature called computer use before, which lets Claude interact with a computer using screenshots, mouse control, and keyboard input. I figured that using this tool, Claude could take control of apps such as Preview, annotate the screenshots, see the results of its efforts, and adjust the positions of the arrows until they were exactly right.
I set everything up, pointed Claude at the folder of screenshots, uploaded the step-by-step instructions it needed to follow, provided some example screenshots, and gave it all the necessary permissions. I set Claude to work and sat back, waiting for my perfectly annotated screenshots to be generated.
Once again, I was hugely disappointed. The arrows often partially obscured the objects that they were meant to point to, pointed past them, or had ridiculously long tails. The icing on the cake was that Claude saved its annotated files over the top of the ones I’d generated with ChatGPT, completely destroying those files.
I tried refining my prompts and giving clearer instructions. Using Opus instead of Sonnet, I was able to get some of the results to be half-decent. The problem was that it wasn’t reliable; I could never manage to get a full set of images that didn’t need some kind of fixing, which completely defeats the purpose.
AI still can’t do everything perfectly
AI is really useful, but there are still things it can’t do without significant human review or correction. The problem is that when AI makes mistakes, fixing those mistakes can often take longer than just doing the job myself. For now, I’ll have to stick to annotating screenshots myself. Maybe Fable 5 can pull it off if we ever see it in action again.
