Nosa Omoigui, CEO of Weave.AI, neuro-symbolic GenAI and intelligent agents that transform alpha decision making and risk analysis.
The SEC’s proposal to permit semiannual reporting instead of quarterly reporting may appear to be a technical regulatory adjustment. The rationale is understandable. Quarterly reporting is expensive, time-consuming and often criticized for encouraging excessive short-term focus over long-term value creation. It can consume enormous organizational energy while encouraging earnings smoothing and delayed restructuring decisions.
But the implications extend far beyond compliance efficiency. The debate is unfolding at precisely the moment when the half-life of materially relevant information is shrinking from months to weeks—and in some cases, from weeks to days.
The Economy Is Accelerating While Disclosure Slows
In many industries, six months now represents an entirely different operating reality. Artificial intelligence illustrates the point. Within a matter of months, assumptions around infrastructure demand, competitive positioning, regulation, monetization and capital intensity can shift materially. A company viewed as strategically advantaged in January may face a fundamentally altered landscape by June, long before another structured filing appears. Even frontier AI systems themselves are now generating systemic concerns among policymakers and central bankers, underscoring how quickly new categories of risk can emerge before governance frameworks adapt.
The rapid pace of change also extends beyond AI. Geopolitical shocks, liquidity stress, regional conflicts, cyber disruptions and abrupt macroeconomic shifts now propagate across global markets.
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank unfolded in days. Tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz have demonstrated how quickly geopolitical instability can ripple through global energy markets, supply chains and inflation expectations. Covid-19 demonstrated how localized disruption can devolve into synchronized global economic shock. The CrowdStrike outage demonstrated how operational failures can cascade across interconnected enterprises and critical infrastructure.
Macroeconomic regimes now shift with similar speed. Markets can move from prolonged low-rate assumptions to tightening cycles, regional banking stress, liquidity withdrawal and abrupt repricing across major asset classes within short periods.
The issue isn’t simply volatility but the growing mismatch between how quickly systemic conditions evolve and how slowly formal disclosure mechanisms update market understanding.
The Enterprise Is No Longer The Boundary Of Risk
One of the flaws in the semiannual reporting debate is that it implicitly treats the enterprise itself as the primary container of risk. That assumption no longer holds.
Modern organizations operate inside interconnected ecosystems of cloud providers, semiconductor supply chains, payment rails, logistics networks, outsourced service providers, counterparties and geopolitical dependencies. Risk increasingly propagates through third-, fourth- and fifth-party relationships that evolve at different speeds and across multiple jurisdictions.
An industrial manufacturer may appear operationally stable while remaining highly exposed to semiconductor concentration, hyperscaler infrastructure or energy-market disruptions. A financial institution may appear well-capitalized while carrying concentrated dependencies on cloud providers, payment infrastructure, outsourced service ecosystems and counterparties whose exposures are shifting.
Increasingly, systemic exposure emerges not from isolated organizational weaknesses, but from interactions across interconnected enterprises moving at different speeds of risk. That reality fundamentally changes the role disclosure plays in modern markets.
Transparency Isn’t Merely About Information
Supporters of semiannual reporting correctly note that companies would still remain subject to securities laws and ongoing disclosure obligations through Form 8-Ks. But quarterly reporting serves a broader function than simply transmitting information to investors. It creates recurring synchronization points for management teams, boards, auditors, regulators and markets. It forces fragmented signals such as supplier fragility, geopolitical exposure, liquidity pressure, counterparty deterioration, operational concentration and reputational stress into structured organizational visibility.
Most enterprise failures don’t emerge from a single catastrophic event. More often, risk accumulates gradually through manageable signals that become dangerous in aggregate.
Quarterly reporting doesn’t eliminate those risks. But it reduces the amount of time they can remain diffused, compartmentalized or insufficiently escalated.
Slower Disclosure In A Faster Contagion Environment
Modern markets are connected through algorithmic trading, passive investment flows, real-time information ecosystems and highly concentrated digital infrastructure. Slowing structured disclosure may not reduce volatility. It may intensify it.
Longer gaps between disclosures could allow larger pools of uncertainty to accumulate beneath the surface, producing fewer but more severe repricing events when conditions finally become visible to markets. Nor is reduced disclosure likely to reduce the market’s demand for transparency. More likely, it will accelerate the expansion of alternative visibility systems already emerging across capital markets: AI-generated analysis, alternative data providers, supplier intelligence, geospatial monitoring and scraped operational signals.
In effect, markets will attempt to reconstruct externally the visibility that formal reporting once provided more systematically.
Governance Must Become Continuous
The debate over quarterly versus semiannual reporting raises a larger concern than disclosure frequency alone. If formal reporting cycles become less frequent while markets, supply chains, geopolitical conditions and enterprise exposures continue evolving at machine speed, the burden on governance systems inevitably increases.
In other words, slower disclosure doesn’t slow risk itself. It simply increases the importance of continuously understanding how risk is evolving between reporting periods.
For boards, CEOs, CROs and CAOs, the central issue is therefore not whether quarterly reporting is burdensome. It unquestionably is. The deeper concern is whether governance systems themselves remain calibrated to the speed at which modern risk evolves.
Many organizations still approach disclosure primarily as a compliance exercise. But in environments where material conditions can shift within weeks, static governance architectures become increasingly insufficient. The challenge is continuously understanding how external realities are evolving relative to enterprise exposure, market expectations and governance obligations. That likely requires a different layer of organizational intelligence.
Artificial intelligence may ultimately become most valuable not as a tool for automating controls, but as a mechanism for continuously synthesizing fragmented external signals into board-relevant insight long before those signals surface through traditional reporting cycles.
The future may not ultimately belong to either quarterly or semiannual reporting alone. In a machine-speed economy, governance itself must increasingly become a continuous discipline. Organizations must be able to see risk quickly enough to govern it before markets, regulators, counterparties or external events force it abruptly and publicly into view.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
