Astronauts on the International Space Station (ISS) briefly took shelter and prepared for a potential evacuation because of worsening air leaks from a Russian-built module, a NASA spokesperson said today.
The leaks are thought to have arisen from microscopic cracks in a transfer tunnel referred to as the PrK, a small vestibule attached to the aft end of the Zvezda Service Module, which leads to a docking port for cargo spacecraft. Zvezda was the first fully Russian contribution to the ISS was installed by the country’s space agency Roscosmos in July 2000. Engineers first noticed the leaks in 2019, but despite multiple efforts across the years to seal them and identify their underlying cause, they have remained a chronic problem. As the leaks have continued, the orbital habitat now loses on the order of a pound of air per day.
“Following new leaks, Roscosmos has elected to proceed with a more extensive repair operation on Friday, June 5,” said NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens in a post on the social media platform X. “Out of an abundance of caution, NASA has directed all four of the agency’s SpaceX Crew-12 members and NASA astronaut Chris Williams to assume an elevated safety posture in the [SpaceX] Dragon spacecraft while the repair is underway.”
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In a statement released in Russian later in the day, Roscosmos officials wrote, “The situation poses no threat to the crew’s safety or onboard systems; pressure aboard the ISS remains stable and is being maintained at the nominal level,” according to a machine translation.
Alongside Williams, at least three Crew-12 astronauts—NASA’s Jessica Meir and Jack Hathaway and the European Space Agency’s Sophie Adenot—sought refuge in a docked Crew Dragon spacecraft. Crew-12 also includes Roscosmos’s Andrey Fedyaev, but it was unclear whether he took shelter alongside his crewmates as directed. Fedyaev’s Russian colleagues Sergei Kud-Sverchkov and Sergey Mikaev remained outside of the Dragon to address the situation.
Shortly after the astronauts entered the Dragon, officials at NASA’s Mission Control Center at the space agency’s Johnson Space Center radioed a directive for them to exit the “safe haven configuration,” noting that “our Russian colleagues have elected to perform measurements only today.”
Stevens clarified her earlier remarks in a follow-up statement on X: “Roscosmos has paused Friday’s structural repair efforts inside the Zvezda service module transfer tunnel, known as the PrK, as more measurements and data is assessed…. We look forward to working with Roscosmos on a collaborative approach to address the leaks.”
Despite the shelter order, which may have arisen from miscommunication between NASA and Roscosmos mission controllers, the astronauts were probably not in any imminent danger, says Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist and space-situational awareness consultant. Onboard air supplies could easily make up the ongoing losses from the leaks. Even so, he says, the situation “is potentially extremely serious.”
“The worry is that a small crack could suddenly get catastrophically bigger,” he says. “That’s unlikely but not impossible, and that would risk loss of the station and crew.”
The scare highlights ongoing concerns over the safety of the aging ISS, which has now been in orbit for more than a quarter-century and is well beyond its intended design life. The leaking PrK has become one of the most significant issues on the station, with NASA officially elevating the problem to its highest category of concern in internal safety evaluations. Protocols are already in place to address the leaks, with the hatch leading from Zvezda to the PrK kept closed unless access to Zvezda is needed. When that hatch is opened, a corresponding hatch capping the U.S. sections of the ISS is closed to limit any catastrophic decompression to Russia’s segment.
NASA has announced plans to retire the ISS by the end of 2030, with deorbiting planned to occur shortly thereafter, but various efforts to further extend the space station’s life are ongoing.
Additional reporting by Meghan Bartels.
Editor’s Note (6/5/26): This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
